My biggest DK Complaint--today anyway

[F, Calla & Luca]

We l actually I have two. I just noticed as I typed this that spell check does not work on titles. No wonder with my typing I have to go back to edit discussion titles at times, never mind about the rest of it.

But my main annoyance. I wish there was a better way for replies to connect to the comment to which the reply is made. It's easy when there's just one reply or a few, on the same page as the original comment. But sometimes there are many replies and they are on two pages or more. I start following and measuring mentally the indentations and go back and forth. And a reply may be totally misunderstood if people think it refers to something other than intended. Sometimes we even run out of the ability to reply directly and we have to backtrack to find a way to do so.

I wonder if there is a better, easier way to reply and connect to the specific thing to which you are responding. I suppose we will be told Ning does not allow for this. I often wish I could do computer programming. Well, my real, formerly secret, ambition is to be a benign computer hacker. But this seems to be an unobtainable goal for someone totally lacking in computer skills : ( 

Any ideas? Maybe Laurie's and others methods of @s would help but sometimes before we reply the first original poster has replied to the thread. Confusion.

[Sherri, Sophie, Winston, & Kitty]

I don't know how to help you but I like that picture :)

[F, Calla & Luca]

But do you at least find yourself in the same dilemma. And yes I think I look great in the picture : )

[Sherri, Sophie, Winston, & Kitty]

sometimes yes, but not too often. I don't know how you would out a solution though.

[Donna K & Quincy]

Hi F, Welcome to my world. I get confused as well, I have a great mind, now if I could only remember where I left it. :>)

[Bonnie and Kona]

OMD This happens to me all of the time, and I find myself going back pages to figure out what a person is replying to. And who or what may I ask is Ning? 

[F, Calla & Luca]

The host whatchamacallit of this site. Maybe it's a website host.

[Bonnie and Kona]

Oh F, that makes it as clear as mud for me. ;o)

[F, Calla & Luca]

Ha.

[Deanna & Desi & Cori]

I know exactly what you're talking about.  Occasionally, a response seems entirely out of context, a kind of "huh?" thing.  And, of course, I worry if my "clever little comment" falls too far away from the post that prompted my comment in the first place that you all will think I'm just nuts or ignorant!!!  LOL

Laurie's @ "so and so" works fairly well unless "so and so" has made multiple comments, then sometimes it's hard to know which of "so and so's" comments Laurie is @-ing about.

No suggestions for helping the situation, though...

[Sherri, Sophie, Winston, & Kitty]

I know, I worry about that too sometimes!

[Laurie, Fudge, and Vern]

Well, I see I got dragged into another of your discussions :) I find it confusing when discussions get to be pages long and you have to scroll through everything to see who is commenting on what statement. I agree that you have a good point :) Great picture!

[Shannon and Finn]

So glad you posted this, I totally thought it was me the first few times but then I realized it is the automatic ordering of replies.  I was initially very confused.  I am not enough of a coding expert to fix it but maybe someone around here is.