Labradoodle & Goldendoodle Forum
I recently filed a claim with PetPlan for the treatment of Ollie’s ear infection. The total treatment costs amounted to $332.82 and I have a $200 deductible with a 10% coinsurance. I wasn’t expecting a huge payment from them, but every little bit helps. Well, I just got a letter in the mail from PetPlan stating that they will not pay out on this claim because it is a pre-existing condition.
When we adopted Ollie last summer (June 2011) he had a double ear infection that was likely caused by the extreme amount of hair in both of his ears. We opened the policy in September 2011. The ear infection related to this claim occurred in February 2012 which is over 6 months since his first issue. I guess I just don’t see how an ear infection can be a pre-existing condition. To me, it would be the same as me getting a head cold in November and one in February. Those are 2 different things. I could get a cold a couple times a year or I could go years and years without a cold. It isn’t a condition, it is just a cold.
The General Exclusions sections of the policy states that they will not pay costs incurred on “any injury or illness that is the same as, or has the same diagnosis or clinical signs or symptoms as any injury, illness, or clinical sign your pet had before the effective date of this policy.”
Has anyone else ever been denied by PetPlan claiming a pre-existing condition? I am trying to decide if I should give them a call or just let it go.
**UPDATE**
I spoke with PetPlan and found out that the ear infection is a pre-existing condition since Ollie had one before I started the policy and there was no diagnosed cause of the infection. There was no diagnosed cause to this most recent infection either. If the vet were able to determine that causes and if there were different then they would have paid out on this claim. PetPlan did tell me that if he goes 24 months without an infection, then they will pay out on the next ear infection claim after that 24 month waiting period. So, if I go to a different vet for any ear infections during the next 2 years and don't notify my regular vet would that constitute insurance fraud? It just seems silly that he has to be symptom free for 2 years before they will pay. Sigh...another lesson on why it is so important to get insurance as soon as you get the pet.
Tags:
Thanks! Let me know if they say anything or delete your question.
This is the response they posted on their FB page
So basically you need to buy pet insurance before your puppy even comes home. Glad I bought Peri's so early, but it's hard to do that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is good to get it immediately : )
Thanks Adrianne. It would be good to know what the exclusionary periods are and if they are reasonable.
That truly seems excessive.
I thought of that too. The problem is that some diseases are very expensive. Our Guinness had Pancreatitis at age two which cost $3000 in Vet bills. In order to cover that I would have had to be banking $125 per month from the time we got him, which is considerably more than what I was paying for insurance. I was lucky that I had the insurance, because it is likely to reoccur. If I had to take out insurance now, that particular condition would be excluded.
© 2024 Created by Adina P. Powered by