Two Doodles get the freedom of the house for 8 hours...

[Hunter and Daisy's Doodle Mom]

I'm sure the title alone may have captured your attention. My one year olds, Daisy and Hunter, are in a trial period of slowly having their "space" expanded while we are away at work or on errands. Now, we all now the Doodles are smart, they can be mischievous, and will sometimes leave you guessing.

Case #06152010. (In case you're wondering where those numbers came from, it's just the date of the crime and I couldn't think of any other random numbers)

I left for work one Tuesday afternoon and decided that I would give them another shot at not being gated up while we were gone at work. This previous Saturday I gave it a test run and they passed with flying colors. It was only 41/2 hours on Saturday; however, today was a very different day. Today, I found out that 8 hours is not 4 hours. The return home became the scene of a heinous crime.

Let the evidence show that one, right foot sandal made by Cabela's has totally disappeared and with obvious teeth marks all along the edges and surface of said sandal.

Let the evidence also reveal that traces of torn up pieces were found on the area where both defendants sleep and play...their blanket.

Who are the defendants?

Daisy...a.k.a. The Diva. Daisy has a prior record, to include destruction on a door jam by chewing and eating an entire hot pink ring toy that she was convicted of sortly after the crime.

Hunter...a.k.a. The Horse. Hunter seems to be the innocent brother of Daisy; however, a darker side will reveal that Hunter aided and abetted with his sister in the destruction on a door jam by chewing. He was also convicted of stealing undergarments from the laundry hamper, and because of his size, he's been caught on several occassions of "counter surfing".

The defendents are on trial and so far, neither one has confessed to the crime and no further evidence has come out....

This trial may take a few days, but we will know which defendant committed this terrible act or if yet again, they were in it together in the trial of "To poo a shoe or not to poo - that is the question".

[Kim]

LOL - that is so funny!

[Denise & Hunter!!!]

LOL LOL LOL I can't quit laughing! I needed this today! I even sent it to my husband - what really cracks me up is my doodle girl is Hunter and everyone I know calls me Daisy not Denise!

[Carole (*Koda*Monty*Bindi)]

Co-Counsel and I are currently requesting a sideBARK with the judge and are requesting a motion to have the case dismissed IMMEDIATELY. Co-Counsel and I are of the belief that the jury pool has been tainted by leaks by the prosecution to the media eluding to prior records that our clients may or may not have had. Not only is there NO substantial PrOOf that one or the other of our clients has committed said crime, their reputations are being tarnished. Co-Counsel and I have every intention of suing for defamation of character and are additionally weighing the possibility of bringing in DPS to further look into these allegations.
Stay tuned for updates and a possible press conference at 11......

[Lucy & AnnaBelle's Mom]

Using your babies as bait for a new pair of summer sandals ....... Oh My .... does anyone else think that we might need to call DPS (Doodle Protective Services) until we determine if these DP (Doodle Parents) are suitable. I believe that we may need to place Daisy and Hunter into Protective (Foster) Care until this trail is over! I'm sure I could arrange to Foster (;o)

[F, Calla & Luca]

Ialso hope Zoe's boyfriend was at least up to page 21.

[F, Calla & Luca]

I think these doodles are the luckiest doodles on earth. To imagine such fine attorneys working pro bone o (I just love that term). Skillfully they are introducing all kinds of possible defenses including what sounds like temporary insanity, or maybe it's like the infamous Twinkie defense. I predict acquital. In the meantime I hope the doodles are free on tail, whoops, I mean bail.

[Hunter and Daisy's Doodle Mom]

Breaking News.....
This just in from our affiliates out of WAGS in Howard City, MI; it appears that the defendants in the "to poo a shoe or not to poo", Hunter and Daisy McDonald, have received help from what appears to be a "dream team" of attorneys, ready to challenge the prosecution on their lack of evidence in the trial. Sorces say that other photos of the crime scene were previously omitted and could end up bringing charges against the parents of Hunter and Daisy. The defense team believes that this startling evidence may show that an ulterior motive existed by the parents and that Hunter and Daisy were framed. We will get you the latest updates as we receive them.

[Liza, Halle and Finn]

Exactly, Karen!
And good point, Co-Counsel!! I also could introduce into evidence the case of Brett Vincent v Kachi/Halle, case 2/xxx2010, wherein Mr Vincent lost the canvas tongue from his new pair of Urban Outfitter shoes, (allegedly by the mouths of my clients, K &H). The case was thrown out of court when the victim, Mr Vincent, admitted that he had wantonly left the shoes out the night before, in full view of my clients, without any regard for their safety (the shoes, not my clients)! By the way, THAT evidence never did reappear!! :)

[Karen, Jasper and Jackdoodle]

ROFL! Perfect! If the shoe doesn't fit, you must acquit!

[Carole (*Koda*Monty*Bindi)]

Caron! Liza and I (as Hunter and Daisy's pro "bone" o lawyers) OBJECT to this line of questioning from the prosecuting attorney! I agree that we need time to evaluate the theory that someone in the household was looking for a new pair of summer shoes! To site the 2009 case of "Gaston-Cramer vs Ali" this was proven to be true during closing arguments when Ali cracked and admitted she wanted a new pair of Rainbows! Gaston-Cramer was cleared and charges dismissed! Liza and demand you end this line of questioning until we meet with our clients.