Labradoodle & Goldendoodle Forum
Tags:
I agree with the advice given so far which is to follow your trainer's advice. That being said, I would pick up any toys that Stewart thinks are high value enough not to want to give up - why set him up when you just want him to obey you. He can have those items back in months when you have solved the problem. I will say however, that we have cans of change in our RV that we shake when the dogs bark. It works - all you are doing by shaking the can is getting their attention so you can make a correction. I would not shake it randomly just to 'get his attention.'
Jess, I posted last night but took it down because after trying to get my thoughts down, I thought it might confuse you. Basically, I think if you are working with a trainer, you should follow her advice. You seem to be getting results. No disrespect to your Aunt - she may be right that Stew may be using your fear to his advantage and you probably need to be more calmly assertive with him -- but I don't agree with any kind of training that frightens or bullies the dog (commonly called alpha dog training). That said, I don't think there's anything wrong with shaking a can or squeaking a toy -- not to startle or frighten him, but to get a pup's attention before you give the next command. The first thing I was taught to use with a pup was the "look" command which I taught Finn using treats. When my dog was a pup and through the teenage years, I always used the "look" command. It alerted him to pay attention to me. I still use it sometimes today. It's funny because it's the first thing I taught him and he's never forgotten it. That's basically what you did last night, and it sounds like Stew gave you the bone without incident -- probably thanks to the exchange groundwork you've been laying with your trainer. Training is complicated and your trainer is seeing the issues firsthand and has worked with lots of dogs. My opinion is stick with her. Discuss concerns and ideas with her. You've done a GREAT job with Stew so far, and if you both keep working on this challenge and I think you'll succeed.
I tend to lean towards your trainer's way of thinking. My dogs don't growl at me but I would rather they feel like they could, rather than suppress it and have it lead to a bite. My rescue tends to resource guard very high-value chewies (bones, kongs, etc.). He has never shown teeth or growled, but will quickly pick the item up if approached. This is dangerous in my opinion. I need to be able to take away anything he is chewing on, especially if it poses a danger. I have worked very diligently to desensitize him to me approaching and/or reaching for that item. I use VERY high value treats (pieces of steak, chicken, etc.) to trade up. And then I give the item back to him. I will do that over and over in a setting, random times, etc. But to be honest, to avoid any sort of discomfort on his part, he just doesn't get high-value chewies.
Interesting comment, which led me to the internet. I didn't find actual 'research' but found a few articles on the topic. I have always believed that it is best to allow a dog to express itself - mostly because that is what makes sense in my mind. But on the other hand, I don't deal with growling.
Two articles which 'support' growling:
http://www.whole-dog-journal.com/issues/13_6/features/Bite-Inhibiti...
http://www.peaceablepaws.com/articles.php?subaction=showfull&id...
But a bit more reading produced this article, which is a VERY interesting read:
http://www.seespotrunkennel.com/blog/punishing-out-warning-signals-...
I am liking that last article a lot. I think it makes far more sense than the typical understanding.
© 2024 Created by Adina P. Powered by